Apocalypse of John

1. Adversus Hermogenem Tertullian 1 authority 1 citation · 2 passages

   adversus hermogenem 2 passages anchored here

   Apocalyptic language about adding/taking away and about heaven and earth passing away is invoked.

   the first heaven and the first earth have gone away, and place was not found for them — because, namely, that which comes to an end loses its place too.

2. Adversus Judaeos Tertullian 1 extended 1 citation

   adversus judaeos

   Explicitly named as 'our John' and used to extend the figurative naming argument.

   So too Babylon in our John is a figure of the city of Rome, inasmuch as it too is great and proud in its kingdom and a vanquisher of the saints.

3. Adversus Praxean Tertullian 1 neutral 1 citation

   adversus praxean

   The Apocalypse text is explicitly introduced and addressed as a source the opponents rely on.

   Meanwhile let me have here a ready answer against that which they bring forward also out of the Apocalypse of John:

4. De Carnis Resurrectione Tertullian 1 authority 1 citation

   de carnis resurrectione

   Explicitly named as "the instrument of John" and cited as an authoritative counter-example.

   For He who set before the sight souls as yet alone, of the martyrs, resting under the altar, could surely also have shown them rising again to the eyes without flesh.

5. De Corona Tertullian 1 authority 1 citation

   de corona

   The Apocalypse of John is explicitly named as the source for the statement about removal from Babylon.

   " From the very dwelling in that Babylon, in the Apocalypse of John, we are removed—much more from its platform.

The harvest records where a citation is made: the paragraph in the citing book, and the chapter that paragraph stands in. It does not record which page of this text is meant. Where the citing text names a locus, you will find it in the quotation.