De Republica Anglorum
Sir Thomas Smith
cited 3 times by 2 works in the library · not held
The library does not hold this work. Two of its books reach for it anyway — that is what puts it on the corpus's wanted list.
cited by
3 citations · from 2 works-
An Essay on the Trial by Jury Lysander Spooner 2 citations · 5 passages
Sir Thomas Smith is quoted as authority contrasting the civil-law judge with the English jury of twelve men.
Sir Thomas Smith, Secretary of State to Queen Elizabeth, writing more than three hundred years after Magna Carta, in describing the difference between the Civil Law and the English Law, says:
ch. 8 ¶ -
The Genius of the Common Law Sir Frederick Pollock 1 citation
Explicitly quoted and named as a competent witness to Tudor governance.
Thus Sir Thomas Smith tells us of ‘the insolency of the noblemen and gentlemen of the north part of England, who being far from the king and the seat of justice made almost as it were an ordinary war among themselves’;
iv.: enemies in the gate ¶
The harvest records where a citation is made: the paragraph in the citing book, and the chapter that paragraph stands in. It does not record which page of this text is meant. Where the citing text names a locus, you will find it in the quotation.
the marks
- authority
- relied on as a source of legitimacy
- neutral
- identified or reported
- refuted
- argued against
- extended
- developed or continued
- endorsed
- agreed with
- roman
- the cited text is in the library and opens in the reader
- italic
- named by this text, not held by the library — the corpus's wanted list
- ¶
- the passage in this text that does the citing
- 7
- beside a chapter, the passages anchored there. A single citation can quote more than one passage, which is why a row carries two figures: the citations the harvest recorded, and the passages its chapters add up to.
Every row here is derived from the harvest, not curated: the citation ledger holds the whole of it, and the atlas states the method.