The Crown
group · 5 works · 5 mentions · 9 anchored passages
the Crown · the king · His Majesty · kings and queens · royal power · the King in Council · the crown · the government · the king's court · the king's justice
in the texts
Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in England
The formal institution of the monarchy, acting through the King in Council and the prerogative of pardon, and functioning in practice as an arm of the Government of the day.
The umpire is a permanent official appointed by His Majesty, i.
Then, too, punishment for crime falls inevitably within the control of the Crown, or in other words of the Government.
These governmental officials have the power to make regulations for the carrying out of the Act which, if not annulled by the King in Council, become part of the Act itself.
An Essay on the Trial by Jury
The monarchy/governing authority that, per the argument, progressively usurped control over jury selection to protect its own power.
These acts gave unlimited authority to the king’s justices to pack juries at their discretion;
Their appointment of sheriffs was, therefore, equivalent to an appointment by the king himself.
It was, in principle, an assertion of a right, on the part of the government, to select the individuals who were to determine the authority of its own laws, and the extent of its own powers.
The Law of Intellectual Property
The English monarchy as the granting authority of patents, portrayed as demeaning true inventors and authors.
An English patent is granted in these supercilious and insolent terms.
The Common Law never required that a freeborn Englishman should “humbly petition” the crown for the enjoyment of his natural rights of property;
“And we, [the queen,] being willing to give encouragement to all arts and inventions, which may be for the public good, are graciously pleased to condescend to the petitioner’s request.
The Genius of the Common Law
The royal institution whose overriding power is credited with rescuing and reshaping the Common Law through royal courts and officers.
The king’s overriding power, a power both to devise and to execute, was the only one strong enough for the work.
Whatever we may think of the king’s new justice, as it stood between six and seven centuries ago, comparing it with all that we have learnt and accomplished since, there is no doubt that it was immensely more rational than the prehistoric methods it supplanted, or that its rapid success was due to its merits.
The Law of Torts
The sovereign authority of the state, whose legal process is treated as carrying greater power of entry than that of a private suitor.
The broad distinction is that outer doors may not be broken in execution of process at the suit of a private person;